You do not have any favourites
News
-
FOR SALE HOMES AND OTHER PROPERTIES WITH DISCOUNTS OF UP TO 64%
21st July 2023 -
EXCHANGE HOUSE IN SUMMER TO SAVE ON VACATIONS: WHERE YOU CAN DO IT AND TIPS
20th July 2023 -
WHAT IS THE CHEAPEST WEEK TO TRAVEL THIS SUMMER?
19th July 2023 -
23J ELECTIONS: HOUSING ANALYSIS AND PROPOSALS
16th July 2023 -
HE SALE OF HOMES MODERATES ITS FALL: IT DECREASES BY 6.4% IN MAY, ITS FOURTH CONSECUTIVE MONTH OF DECLINES
14th July 2023 -
THE RENTAL PRICE IN EUROPE MODERATES IN THE SECOND QUARTER
10th July 2023 -
SMALL HOUSES: 12 IDEAS TO DECORATE YOURS AND THE 5 BEST INTERIOR DESIGNERS' TIPS
9th July 2023 -
WHAT TO DO IF YOUR HOME IS OCCUPIED WHILE YOU'RE ON VACATION?
8th July 2023 -
HACIENDA ISSUES A NOTICE TO ALL HOMEOWNERS
7th July 2023 -
BEST MORTGAGES | JULY 2023
6th July 2023
THE JUSTICE DOES NOT CONSIDER PROVEN WHO SIGNED A CREDIT AGREEMENT THROUGH THE DocuSign SYSTEM
10th May 2021A financial entity claimed the payment of the debit balance derived from a loan contract that was signed through the DocuSign system. However, the counterpart claimed that the signature on it was false.
The claim was upheld in the first instance. Now, the Provincial Court of Lleida considers the appeal of the claim and acquits it from paying the amount claimed, for not accrediting the credit institution that the signature that appears in the contract was real.
As stated by the court in the judgment, the signature was made through the DocuSign system, an electronic signature platform through which the document is sent to an email and returned manually signed, without any accreditation of who has signed. whoever they say they are and without account authentication.
The audience, however, must consider that it is properly an electronic signature, based on a recognized certificate and created by a legally recognized digital signature certification entity, but rather an unrecognized autographed manual signature.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960