You do not have any favourites
News
-
Ley de Vivienda (Año II): crisis en el alquiler con más demanda, menos oferta y precios disparados
27th May 2025 -
The development of residential complexes for seniors is growing: there are already more than 5,400 housing units
22nd May 2025 -
According to BBVA Research, housing prices will increase by 7.3% in 2025 and by 5.3% in 2026
19th May 2025 -
Home sales surge by 40% and record their best March since 2007
16th May 2025 -
James Bond's mansion in Nice (France) is back on the market for 6.5 million less
16th May 2025 -
INCREASE IN THE BUYING AND SELLING OF HOMES
8th April 2025 -
INCREASE IN HOME PURCHASES BY FOREGNERS
8th April 2025 -
DECREASE IN RENTAL SUPPLY
8th April 2025 -
STRENGTH OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET DESPITE CHALLENGES
8th April 2025 -
FOR SALE HOMES AND OTHER PROPERTIES WITH DISCOUNTS OF UP TO 64%
21st July 2023
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
2nd June 2021The second would be to interpret what it means that one spouse can oppose the other to exercise the trade referred to in art. 10 CCom, which has given rise to different opinions, since for some it is not possible to oppose, except for justified cause, not being possible to consent to the activity and not the patrimonial responsibility, while for others, although this last possibility would result in that the goods acquired by the trade were exclusive to the business spouse and not community property (CUENA CASAS), an opinion that would not cease to have a certain historical basis (Law 223 of the Laws of Style)
We will follow the opinion of Peña, Ragel, and Guilarte Cutierrez who rightly consider that no spouse can refuse to allow the other to engage in business, with no justification being necessary for this, being in any case the property acquired, despite the opposition, in the case of of an unfortunate expression of our CCom that must restrict its scope EXCLUSIVELY to that of the responsibility of the joint assets.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960