You do not have any favourites
News
-
FOR SALE HOMES AND OTHER PROPERTIES WITH DISCOUNTS OF UP TO 64%
21st July 2023 -
EXCHANGE HOUSE IN SUMMER TO SAVE ON VACATIONS: WHERE YOU CAN DO IT AND TIPS
20th July 2023 -
WHAT IS THE CHEAPEST WEEK TO TRAVEL THIS SUMMER?
19th July 2023 -
23J ELECTIONS: HOUSING ANALYSIS AND PROPOSALS
16th July 2023 -
HE SALE OF HOMES MODERATES ITS FALL: IT DECREASES BY 6.4% IN MAY, ITS FOURTH CONSECUTIVE MONTH OF DECLINES
14th July 2023 -
THE RENTAL PRICE IN EUROPE MODERATES IN THE SECOND QUARTER
10th July 2023 -
SMALL HOUSES: 12 IDEAS TO DECORATE YOURS AND THE 5 BEST INTERIOR DESIGNERS' TIPS
9th July 2023 -
WHAT TO DO IF YOUR HOME IS OCCUPIED WHILE YOU'RE ON VACATION?
8th July 2023 -
HACIENDA ISSUES A NOTICE TO ALL HOMEOWNERS
7th July 2023 -
BEST MORTGAGES | JULY 2023
6th July 2023
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
18th May 2021APPROACH
The objective of these notes is to show how the regulation of the 1975 and 1981 laws is now totally obsolete and in practice implies, in addition to an unjustified privilege in favor of the merchant's or professional's creditors, a clear attack on the principle equality between spouses and especially an attack on women.
As we know, the incorporation of women into the world of work today is massive, but statistics show that in terms of commercial activity, either as self-employed entrepreneurs or as partners and administrators of capital companies, the number of men is much higher than that of women, while these are the majority in other activities different from the commercial one.
Let's take an assumption: marriage in which the husband exercises a commercial activity individually and the wife is a civil servant at the service of the public administration. In this case, what both earn will be community, but, if the husband contracts debts for his aforementioned activity, the creditors may go against ALL THE PROFITS, including those corresponding to the wife, which by the way the creditors outside the said activity of either of the two spouses in debts contracted by only one inasmuch as, except in one of the cases in which the CC directly subject the community property, they could only go against the private property of the debtor and in default of these against their part in the joint property as indicated in art. 1373 which constitutes the general rule in this matter.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960